Beyond GRC: Integrated Security Risk Management
There are images of extensive, verbose documents, complex definitions, and eye-watering Excel sheets when the term GRC is mentioned. For the past two decades, GRC has been central to core business processes across many organisations at both ends of the enterprise spectrum, as well as in the small-to-medium business space in recent times.
But the world has moved on; organisations are forced to embrace digital disruption and agility if they haven’t done so whole-heartedly. And this very disruption is positioning GRC to become less-than-ideal to solve the challenges that said disruption brings with it.
Many organisations are being overwhelmed by the magnitude, velocity, and complexity of existing and emerging risks – struggling to respond to business risks, rather than seizing opportunities that drive the business forward. The reason is that many organisations’ current risk management mechanisms are undeveloped, disconnected or ineffective.
However, organisations naturally adapt, and it is only later that they reflect and label these adaptions and responses to their ever-changing environment. Over the past three years, we have noticed an extensive shift in thinking; organisations need security management in-line with their processes, as opposed to existing as a silo-ed approach. This is a repetition of a previous trend of IT being an independent function.
What is this phenomenon called? We would like to posit (though we cannot claim original ownership of the phrase) that this is integrated security risk management; an approach that exists within an organisation’s core business functions and processes. Integrated security risk management (ISRM) refers to a set of practices designed to help organisations understand and manage the full scope of risks (strategic, operational, financial, digital, etc.) facing their enterprises, with more flexibility and agility than traditional GRC programs.
Organisations must manage risk with more agility and integration than ever before. The strategies driving business success – for example, technology adoption or market expansion –introduce more risk. The interdependence of digital and business strategies have converged cybersecurity and business risks creating a complex set of problems. On top of this, as can be seen with the introduction of new legislation in Australia and Europe, there is increased scrutiny by regulators and government agencies.
Organisations have an increasing reliance on external parties including service providers, contractors, consultants and other third parties that complicate their business risks. The media is ready to pounce on any incident – from a data breach to a compliance failure to a corporate scandal. Increasing reliance on technology exposes businesses to the explosion of dangerous cyber threats. Any delay or setback in meeting business objectives can mean the difference between success and failure in today’s highly competitive market.
In our view, and in a view supported by many of the security industry’s thought leaders, security risk management must not only connect traditional domains but also across business units and the overall business strategy.
As risk management programs mature, the organisation starts building a truly integrated view of risk and is better positioned to adjust risk management strategies to address the volatile nature of risk in today’s enterprise.
see our
Related resources
Mimecast recently released its State of Email Security Report for 2021. The fifth edition of its annual report used interviews with over twelve hundred of information technology and cybersecurity professionals across the globe to gather vital cybersecurity insights. The report offers an insight into the latest email threats along with advice on how to build cyber resilience and mitigate the risks of email-borne attacks.
Cyber attacks and data breaches have been commonplace in the news headlines for some time now. Although a warning from the media is certainly helpful, there is so much more that can be done when it comes to threat intelligence sharing. Threat intelligence sharing is an important part of the global cybersecurity community effort to tackle cybercrime and should form a part of every organisation’s cybersecurity strategy. Sharing cyber threat intelligence enables organisations to make informed decisions about their cybersecurity, building more effective and robust cyber defences.
One of my favourite annual reports to read is the Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report. It’s packed full of insights about the threat landscape and security leaders, in my opinion, should read this report to get a pulse on what’s happening in cyber-scape.
After all, as cyber leaders, we are here to stop breaches – so the insights gained from real cyber incidents and breaches is gold in learning how to tighten up our defences.
All businesses, large and small, are under increasing pressure to demonstrate that they are managing the risk of cyberattacks. This means having the right processes and controls in place to identify risks and vulnerabilities, protect information, as well as detect, respond, and recover in the event of cybersecurity incidents. As such, many businesses are turning to certification authorities and security frameworks to demonstrate privacy and security best practice and achieve compliance with regulatory bodies. System and Organisation Controls (SOC 2) is one such compliance framework that can help organisations to create a structured approach to cybersecurity.
Frost & Sullivan has recently released its 2021 Frost Radar: Email Security report, where its findings provide a benchmarking framework to help businesses protect their email from cyber threats.
As we operate in an increasingly digital world, every business collect, store, and share more and more data. And, amongst that data is personal information. With the OAIC marking this year’s Privacy Awareness Week (PAW) from Monday 3 May to Sunday 9 May 2021, it’s time for us all to review how we protect our customers’ personal information.
We're Here To Help