Penetration Testing vs Red Teaming: What’s the difference?
In today’s digital age, we all use a vast amount of information to conduct our business activities, sharing, and interacting with data across multiple devices and networks. As such confidentiality, integrity and availability are key. You only have to look at recent news headlines to realise that even organisations with comprehensive security strategies are still vulnerable to cybersecurity breaches. Vulnerabilities can lie within the technology being used, the cyber-awareness of its employees, and the sophistication of attacks.
Not only do organisations need to protect their intellectual property, but they also need to protect their customers and adhere to regulatory standards. Security professionals aim to manage the risk and deliver systems with acceptable assurance by implementing technological and organisational security measures, but they need to regularly verify that it is working. This is where security assurance services come into play. Penetration testing and red teaming assess an organisation’s defences against confidentiality, authentication, and integrity to give businesses confidence that the security measures they’ve put in place are delivering.
InfoTrust Security Practice Director, Saaim Khan, outlines the key differences between the two approaches and how a business would decide between penetration testing and red teaming.
What is the Difference Between Penetration Testing and Red Teaming?
There is a lot of confusion between penetration testing and red teaming. At first glance, they can seem extremely similar. Both aim to find vulnerabilities in an organisation’s security systems. Every business is at risk of someone stealing sensitive data, taking over its network, installing malware, or disrupting services. While the security team maintains and monitors the situation, they can always do with an outside perspective. Both forms of security assurance service offer this, aiming to find as many vulnerabilities and configuration issues as they can and then exploiting them to determine risk levels.
However, there are also some key differences between penetration testing and red teaming from the scope to the work that is carried out:
- Penetration testing – while penetration testing came first and was initially a limitless attempt to breach defences, as it became more mainstream, it became commoditised. Today’s pen tests no longer test the entire system but aim at defined targets such as web applications, networks, or systems. While more than one pen test can be executed, they ultimately test systems independently. As they are aimed at target systems, they don’t test the entire business. Pen tests are more controlled, shorter, use commercial tools, and are carried out with the knowledge of the organisation and its employees.
- Red teaming – given its name due to its adversarial approach, red teaming focuses on using strategies to encourage an outsider perspective and simulate a real-life situation. Red teaming considers the full ecosystem, meaning that, instead of uncovering vulnerabilities in one system, it aims to find out how a determined cyber attacker would gain access. The approach uses multiple attack vectors simultaneously, is done without the knowledge of the organisation’s employees, and takes longer as testers aim to avoid detection. As red teaming involves more people, resources, and time, it enables testers to dig deeper to fully understand the realistic levels of risk against technology, people, and physical assets.
Why Would a Business Choose Red Teaming Over Penetration Testing?
While penetration testing can take an organisation so far, validating whether controls are protecting key assets, it doesn’t truly simulate a real-world attack. Penetration testing is ideal for spot checks; however, they don’t inform businesses as to whether an attacker could compromise a user’s credentials, escalate network privileges, and gain control.
Red teaming is typically employed by companies with more mature security postures. Penetration testing will have allowed them to find and patch vulnerabilities. However, the next step is discovering if someone can still access sensitive information or breach defences when using multiple simultaneous approaches.
Red teaming helps organisations truly test their defences by:
- Identifying physical, hardware, software, and human vulnerabilities.
- Obtaining a more realistic understanding of business risk.
- Gaining a fresh perspective, overcoming cognitive errors and group thinking to build an objective view of security.
- Reviewing the organisation’s ability to not only protect its sensitive data but to detect and respond to an advanced attack.
- Delivering a report on how to fix, patch, remediate, and train to reduce the chance of a successful real-life attack.
How to Decide Between Pen Testing and Red Teaming
Both penetration testing and red teaming play an important role in a business’ overall security testing program. The trick, of course, is knowing when and where to use them.
If your organisation is looking to achieve a holistic understanding of how your people, systems, and protocols would fair under a realistic cyber-attack, then we would advise you to consider Red Teaming.
Until the end of June, we will be running an exclusive offer on our security assurance services; including Penetration Testing and Red Teaming. To find out more, get in touch with the InfoTrust team today.
see our
Related resources
Cybersecurity should be front of mind for every organisation, especially in the wake of the current global pandemic. Our ways of working have changed immensely, with a surge in the volume of remote workers using different networks, devices, and platforms. Meanwhile, our businesses are using cloud computing and IoT technologies to facilitate new ways of working, reduce costs, and improve performance. The result is that the attack surface has increased, and with that comes an increase in the volume of cyber threats.
There are images of extensive, verbose documents, complex definitions, and eye-watering Excel sheets when the term GRC is mentioned. For the past two decades, GRC has been central to core business processes across many organisations at both ends of the enterprise spectrum, as well as in the small-to-medium business space in recent times.
But the world has moved on; organisations are forced to embrace digital disruption and agility if they haven’t done so whole-heartedly. And this very disruption is positioning GRC to become less-than-ideal to solve the challenges that said disruption brings with it.
Phishing attacks have increased dramatically over the last few years, with the global pandemic escalating the situation further. Cybercriminals take advantage of insecurities and fear and play on human nature to trick and deceive. In fact, according to the OAIC, phishing attacks that involved compromised credentials accounted for 30% of all cyber incidents in the first half of 2021. And human error formed a major source of these breaches. Unfortunately, due to the clever social engineering tactics used by cybercriminals, technical filters alone aren’t sufficient to protect against phishing.
Mimecast recently released its State of Email Security Report for 2021. The fifth edition of its annual report used interviews with over twelve hundred of information technology and cybersecurity professionals across the globe to gather vital cybersecurity insights. The report offers an insight into the latest email threats along with advice on how to build cyber resilience and mitigate the risks of email-borne attacks.
Article updated 27th June 2022
Secure Access Service Edge, better known as SASE (pronounced sassy – yes that is right) was one of the new security terms on the block in 2019. But it’s actually been around for some time, just without its official moniker. It is expected that by 2024, at least 40% of enterprises will have strategies in place to adopt SASE, according to Gartner.
In this post, we take a look at why its popularity is increasing, what the term means, and how vendors and organisations are utilising it to enable digital transformation.
We're Here To Help